The report submitted by the municipal corporation before the court stated that out of a total of 72 marked illegal encroachments, only 14 were removed on May 17. The rest could not be cleared due to obstructions and hindrances created by the advocates, it said.

As noted in the court order, the District Judge, through a letter dated May 18, informed the Registrar General of the High Court that the Central Bar Association, Lucknow, and the Lucknow Bar Association had resolved to abstain from work from May 18 to 20.

The District Judge also submitted a report along with a pen drive containing photos and videos of the strike and meetings of Bar Association members. One video reportedly showed an advocate distributing plastic batons, commonly used by police or PAC personnel. The court took the report on record.

Contrary to SC directions

In its order, the bench of Justices Chauhan and Bharti stated that the advocates abstained from judicial work from May 18-26 on the call of office bearers of the two bar Associations, causing serious prejudice to litigants. It observed that many litigants were poor and suffered financial loss due to travel and delays.

The court further stated that strikes or boycotts by the Lawyers’ Association are contrary to Supreme Court directions, and such conduct is unjustified and illegal. The SC had said the right to strike cannot be justified under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, as it affects the rights of others, particularly the right to speedy justice under Articles 14 and 21, the court observed in the order.

Heavy Police force deployed also Lathi charge during Lucknow Municipal Corporation demolishing allegedly unauthorised chambers near the High Court complex in Kaiserbagh area of Lucknow. (Express Photo by Vishal Srivastav)

The bench observed that despite clear Supreme Court directions, advocates proceeded with the strike and boycott. It also noted allegations that plastic batons were distributed during a meeting in the presence of office bearers, accompanied by slogans that advocates shall now handle the administration using these lathis.

The bench stated in the order, “We hereby treat the aforesaid strike/ boycott of judicial work… as unjustified and illegal and consequential orders to that effect would be issued subsequently.”

Notices issued

The court was informed that the general secretary of the Central Bar Association, Lucknow, had issued show-cause notices on May 21 to the three advocates. Notices were issued to Uttam Tripathi who allegedly distributed plastic lathis; Himanshu Mishra, who allegedly made provocative speeches on social media; and Brijesh Kumar Yadav, who allegedly made irresponsible comments about the Administrative Judge, allegedly creating unrest among advocates.

Heavy Police force deployed also Lathi charge during Lucknow Municipal Corporation demolishing allegedly unauthorised chambers near the High Court complex in Kaiserbagh area of Lucknow. (Express Photo by Vishal Srivastav)

The Bar Association also issued expulsion letters dated June 4 against Tripathi and Yadav, expelling them for five years from primary membership of the association considering their explanation.

Listing the case for further hearing for July 27, the bench directed the advocates to submit their explanation within two weeks, supported with an affidavit giving an undertaking that they shall follow the dictums of the apex court referred to in the order and maintain good conduct and behaviour in the interest of institution.

The bench added, “It is needless to say that any appropriate order would be passed after considering the explanation and undertaking of the aforesaid advocates.”