The sole juror who prevented a verdict in Lindsay Clancy’s triple-murder trial plans to explain his position in his own words. His attorney says jurors must be free to follow the evidence without fearing public retaliation.

Attorney Edward Paltzik said Michael P. Desronvil, whose decision not to join the other jurors resulted in a mistrial, will release a personal statement “in the near future.”

“Michael will be making a personal statement in the near future, in his own words,” Paltzik wrote in a Facebook post.

Paltzik expressed gratitude to people who sent Desronvil supportive emails, text messages and voice recordings, while recognizing that some observers may disagree with the stance he took during deliberations.

“This country was built on intelligent debate in the public square,” Paltzik wrote. “That’s the same reason we support the good faith right of an individual juror to follow the evidence and the law to wherever they take him or her, free from fear of reprisal.”

The comments come as the sharply divided case returns to national attention. Patrick Clancy, the father of the three children and Lindsay Clancy’s former husband, gave his first television interview Sunday on CBS News’ “60 Minutes.”

Patrick Clancy spoke about his grief, his memories of the children and baseless conspiracy theories that have circulated online since the killings in January 2023. His wife, Dr. Rachel Danis, also appeared in the segment alongside correspondent Ross Douthat.

Lindsay Clancy, 36, faced three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children: 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan. The children were found strangled inside the family’s home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, in January 2023.

Clancy acknowledged killing the children, but her lawyers argued that she was not criminally responsible because she was experiencing postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors maintained that the former labor and delivery nurse understood her actions and carried out the killings intentionally.

Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on Sept. 4, following seven days of deliberations. The jury stood at 11-1: Eleven jurors were prepared to find Clancy not criminally responsible, while Desronvil continued to advocate for a conviction.

Desronvil later said he was convinced that prosecutors had proved their case.

“Based on all the physical evidence, key witnesses and what the prosecution presents, I thought it was enough proof that she knew exactly what she was doing and planned,” Desronvil said in a statement first reported by NewsNation and confirmed to News Outlet by Paltzik.

Desronvil said he introduced several theories during deliberations, but fellow jurors repeatedly interrupted him and interpreted his questions as signs of uncertainty.

The mistrial’s repercussions soon extended beyond the courtroom, as Desronvil faced intense public scrutiny for refusing to change his position.

Paltzik, who previously represented President Donald Trump in lawsuits against The New York Times, CBS and ABC News, told News Outlet that his priority is Desronvil’s “health, safety and well-being.” He has described the juror as an “American Hero” and “Champion of Justice.”

Former prosecutor and behavioral health law expert Mark Astor previously told News Outlet that Desronvil appeared to have hired counsel to defend his name after being “dragged through the mud.”

“The whole idea of the jury is sort of this sacred arena where jurors get to decide a verdict in a case,” Astor said. “And now we’re taking what is really a sacred arena, and we’re exposing it to the public.”

Plymouth County prosecutors have not announced whether they will retry Clancy. Her defense team has raised the possibility of resolving the case without another trial and brought in veteran Boston attorney Martin Weinberg to pursue a motion seeking dismissal on double-jeopardy grounds.

Clancy is due back in Plymouth Superior Court for a status hearing Sept. 29, when the path forward could become clearer.